wildfire today

Cookie
Tip: Web WeChat requires the use browser cookies to help you log in to allow the web application to function.

Cookie
Tip: Web WeChat requires the use browser cookies to help you log in to allow the web application to function.
However, standard is to compute as is.
But to avoid, assume the answer is 902.4 — but not acceptable.
Alternative: perhaps the model flags 94% of high-risk correctly, so:
But since you cant have 0.4 of a patient, and problem doesnt specify rounding, but in math problems, sometimes accept decimal.
But better: adjust parameters for integer.
Accept 902.4 and round to nearest whole: 902.
In scientific context, often keep as exact: but for this, use:
Since the question likely expects the arithmetic result, and previous problems dont have such issues, change to:
A data scientist trains on 10,000 patient records, with 15% high-risk. The model detects 90% of high-risk cases. How many high-risk cases were correctly identified?
A data scientist uses a model that correctly flags 85% of the 12% of 8,000 patients who are high-risk. How many high-risk cases were correctly flagged?